@c-po @UnicronNL have this ever been solved?

it´s normally shipped as separate package? (that ldap plugin)

Likely be addressed in 1.3

@UnicronNL maybe you can advise here

@pers.edwin does this happens on 1.2 too?

I will suggest perform testing on 1.2 since we not going to patch 1.1.x line anymore

Can you test on nightlies please

We may want to consider other backend for web proxy functionality

Agree,
@c-po what will be best way to start with that,
i can collect vyos settings a map them to pdns config options, not that much there actually

Impossible to implement

@c-po that sucks as this is huge problem for me (but not only)
I will create separate request for powerdns-recursor implementation and we likely need to move that functionality there
@dmbaturin @UnicronNL for what we use dnsmasq apart from dns forwarding?

Can you look into that

@dmbaturin @UnicronNL can you comment on this

Daniil, please take a look and merge

1.2.x nighlies have support for ipv6

Thanks @woodypl !
@dmbaturin @c-po can you take a look please

@sergei yes, please put it here for records

for type1 we need setup LACP by default

Jacob:
Some networking info that might be helpful.
If you want to chat about full specs let me know, or we can review what is relevant.
What is your requirements / recommended setup?
Type0: 1 Gbps Network (2 × 1Gbps w/ TLB) full hardware redundancy but no active/active bond.
Type1: 2 Gbps Bonded Network (2 × 1Gbps w/ LACP) full hardware redundancy and active/active bond.
Type1e: 10 Gbps Network (2 × Intel X710 NIC's in TLB) full hardware redundancy but no active/active bond.
Type2: 20 Gbps Bonded Network (2 × 10Gbps w/ LACP) full hardware redundancy and active/active bond.
Type2A: 20 Gbps Bonded Network (2 × 10Gbps w/ LACP) full hardware redundancy and active/active bond.
Type3: 20 Gbps Bonded Network (2 × 10Gbps w/ LACP) full hardware redundancy and active/active bond.
TypeS: 20 Gbps Bonded Network ( 2 × 10 Gbps w/ LACP) full hardware redundancy and active/active bond.

This is version that was blocked,

@sergei can you check 1.2 behaviour too please

whitelisted, should be ok now

Sorry @c-po i think it will not hurt

Sorry for that
Will whitelist you now
we had issue with spammers in past  and not much contributors :)

Ed please share this extra details so we can add it on wiki too